Free-Speech Ethics News Blog Disclaimer

ANTI-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) DISCLAIMER
ARTICLES WRITTEN ON THIS BLOG ARE IN RESPONSE TO AN ISSUE(S) OF PUBLIC CONCERN, AND TO ADDRESS ETHICAL CHOICES MADE BY HUMANS. THE FREE-SPEECH CONTENT PRODUCED AND PUBLISHED FOR THIS BLOG IS PROTECTED BY THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, AS WELL AS SECTION 9 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, AS WELL AS NEVADA Senate Bill 286, WHICH PROVIDES IMMUNITY AND PROTECTION FOR "free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern."

BLOG DOES NOT PROMOTE HATRED, OR VIOLENCE against individuals

BLOG DOES NOT PROMOTE HATRED, OR VIOLENCE against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity is shocking or graphic, without more context or commentary threatens others. THIS BLOG DOES DISCUSS CHOICES MADE BY PERSONS, AND THE ETHICAL, SOCIAL, SOCIETAL, AND WHEN APPLICABLE, RELIGIOUS IMPLICATIONS, OF THEIR CHOICES. BLOG WRITERS HAVE NO CONTROL OVER CHOICES OF THE SUBJECTS APPEARING IN THIS BLOG, AND HAVE NOT MET SUCH PERSONS. All speech and commentary appearing on the Ethics News Blog concerning public figures or public officials, as well as speech concerning matters of public interest is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, California Civil Code section 47 et seq., Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as the recent enactment of California Senate Bill 1296, as well as the standards applied in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 Supreme Court 710m 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), and Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution of the State of California. Please be advised that any viewpoints or opinions expressed herein are solely the viewpoints, ideas, sentiments, beliefs, and/or opinions of the respective author(s), and said viewpoints, ideas, sentiments, beliefs, or opinions, do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints, ideas, sentiments, beliefs, or opinions of any sponsors, advertisers, including, but not limited, or any other affiliated entities mentioned herein unless specifically noted otherwise, and neither does such viewpoints, ideas, sentiments, beliefs, and/or opinions reflect or convey or reflect the opinion or viewpoint(s) of any advertiser or sponsor unless specifically authored by said person(s). No part of this Ethics News Blog publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm, mimeograph, facsimile, hyperlink to other web sites, or any other printed or electronic means now known or hereafter invented, or for presentation on radio, television, videotape, or film without explicit and authorized permission of counsel or blog author, Ron Thomas,or his agent or representative.

Complaints to Google Inc. to Censor Ethics Media Blog

The only persons who have complianed about the content in this blog are the persons who engaged in appropriate behavior, or who are identified as subjects in the Ethics Media Blog. Guess what? All blog articles are backed-up.

We understand that Google does not like this blog either. So what. All posts are backed up. We will re-posts the same posts, and make them even better than before!!!

subHumans Hate Ethics Media Blog

We understand that many persons hate this blog. We are not to blame for the choices made by subHumans. subHumans make their own choices and mate with other subHumans.

Ethics Media Blog is not responsible for subHuman Behavior

We are not responsible for low I.Q. famales using dating apps, only to find their future murderer insteasd of their future husband. We are not responsible for teachers abusing students. We are not responsible for genetically inferior persons making immoral decisions.

No comments: